Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nadezda Petrova vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Petrova vs Mattek-Sands analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
 First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Nadezda Petrova vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Petrova 3 - 0 Mattek-Sands
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Petrova has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mattek-Sands has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Petrova, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mattek-Sands has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Petrova has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mattek-Sands has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Petrova has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mattek-Sands winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Petrova has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 51/ 28), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 217/ 136). Mattek-Sands has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 107/ 82), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 180/ 173).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Petrova winning 3 times and Mattek-Sands being victorious 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Petrova winning 6 and Mattek-Sands winning 2. The last match between Petrova and Mattek-Sands was at the Pilot Pen Tennis at Yale - New Haven, 25-08-2010, Second, Hard with Nadezda Petrova getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:22:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Petrova and Mattek-Sands have played a deciding set 2 times, with Petrova winning 2 times and Mattek-Sands 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Petrova winning 0, and Mattek-Sands 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Petrova has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mattek-Sands has played against players with an average rank of 81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Petrova has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mattek-Sands has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Petrova has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mattek-Sands has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
3
High
42
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
665
Rank
30
High
39
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
63% (476-285)
Career Total W/L
53% (356-313)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$4,732,128
Career Prize Money
$1,687,071
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nadezda Petrova vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Petrova VS Mattek-Sands
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit DoubledÂ
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Petrova VS Mattek-Sands H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Nadezda Petrova | Bethanie Mattek-Sands |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 2 |
| Games Won | 43 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 8 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:22:30 | 0:22:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (69/130) | 51% (72/142) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (58/69) | 63% (45/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (28/61) | 46% (32/70) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (8/14) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (65/142) | 34% (44/130) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Petrova VS Mattek-Sands H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
47%
(
38 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
9
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
5
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadezda Petrova | Bethanie Mattek-Sands |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:13:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 162 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 48% (20/42) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (7/20) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 23% (5/22) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (31/67) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Nadezda Petrova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Nadezda Petrova
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Nadezda Petrova
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
88)
4
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
6
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Urszula Radwanska
47%
(
55 of
117)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
7
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
39%
(
24 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
53%
(
62 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Silvia Soler-Espinosa
Player
Nadezda Petrova
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
25%
(
2 of
8)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
33%
(
1 of
3)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
8
Total Points Won
8
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carla Suarez Navarro
Player
Nadezda Petrova
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shuai Peng
Player
Nadezda Petrova
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Yuliya Beygelzimer
50%
(
37 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Marta Domachowska
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dinah Pfizenmaier
Player
Nadezda Petrova
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
10
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Maria-Teresa Torro-Flor
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Bethanie Mattek-Sands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
39%
(
26 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danka Kovinic
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Xiaodi You
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Alycia Parks
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shuai Zhang
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
73 of
123)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
48 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
123)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Petrova Vs Mattek-Sands Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Petrova are available here and Mattek-Sands photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
